Genetics
Steve Hsu — Intelligence, Embryo Selection, & The Future of Humanity — page 1
30 discussions1 episode6 research notes
What does the evidence say?
Start with these 6 research notes.
- Context added
A successful predictor has a defined outcome and test population
In the listening map: 11:47–16:17 →
- Context added
Four estimated years are not four observed extra years of life
In the listening map: 34:55–39:50 →
- Context added
A score can lose accuracy when its training population changes
In the listening map: 58:24–1:03:20 →
- Context added
Sibling comparisons address specific sources of bias
In the listening map: 1:18:53–1:23:25 →
- Context added
Producing functional mouse eggs is not human clinical validation
In the listening map: 1:36:43–1:41:41 →
- Context added
Mathematical similarity does not make a market a physical law
In the listening map: 1:49:48–1:53:05 →
The listening map
Matched automatically from captions; may miss or mislabel.
30 discussions across 1 episodes.
Steve Hsu — Intelligence, Embryo Selection, & The Future of Humanity
30 discussions · Timestamps from the Publisher audio edition
-
0:00–5:00 (external site)
Hsu recalls an encounter with Richard Feynman and the personal advice he says Feynman offered.
Scientific careers
-
5:00–10:00 (external site)
Hsu continues his recollections and discusses changes he observed in weight training and athletic culture.
Scientific careers
-
10:00–11:47 (external site)
The speakers compare historical images of physique with modern athletic training; Hsu offers his interpretation of changing physical culture.
Scientific careers
-
11:47–16:17 (external site)
Hsu introduces genomic prediction as a statistical problem and describes his company’s proposed application to choosing among IVF embryos.
Polygenic scores
Research note: A successful predictor has a defined outcome and test population →
-
16:17–21:04 (external site)
Hsu describes his move from physics into genomics, compressed sensing and his group’s claims about the sample sizes needed for prediction.
Polygenic scores
-
21:04–25:01 (external site)
Hsu explains additive predictors, correlated variants and sparse optimisation; Patel asks why selection has not maximised the traits discussed.
Polygenic scores
-
25:01–29:58 (external site)
Hsu discusses evolutionary arguments for additive variation and argues that changing environments complicate ideas of biological optimisation.
Natural selection
-
29:58–34:55 (external site)
The speakers use software analogies to discuss genetic architecture; Hsu argues that many disease predictors involve relatively distinct sets of variants.
Evolutionary trade-offs
-
34:55–39:50 (external site)
Patel asks about a health-index result; Hsu discusses available genetic variation and extrapolates from selection and breeding to potential human interventions.
Embryo selection
Research note: Four estimated years are not four observed extra years of life →
-
39:50–43:20 (external site)
Hsu forecasts future editing capabilities and discusses possible longevity gains, while acknowledging uncertainty about ultimate biological limits.
Genetic engineering
-
43:20–46:25 (external site)
Hsu discusses clinic relationships, data access, patents and the uncertain durability of his company’s scientific advantage.
Genomic prediction business
-
46:25–51:05 (external site)
Hsu describes embryo-sample processing and possible cloud services, then forecasts facial prediction while saying his company does not offer that service.
Genomic prediction business
-
51:05–54:50 (external site)
The speakers discuss genetic identification and privacy; Hsu distinguishes disease risk from diagnosis and speculates about future longevity and inequality.
Genetic privacy
-
54:50–58:24 (external site)
The speakers discuss variation among possible offspring; Hsu speculates about genetic compatibility and possible reproductive applications.
Embryo selection
-
58:24–1:03:20 (external site)
Hsu acknowledges environmental effects on height and reduced prediction quality across ancestry groups, discussing possible explanations and future data needs.
Polygenic scores
Research note: A score can lose accuracy when its training population changes →
-
1:03:20–1:06:45 (external site)
The speakers consider distinguishing causal variants from statistical tags and discuss uncertainties and controversies around interpreting population differences.
Polygenic scores
-
1:06:45–1:11:18 (external site)
The speakers speculate about regulation and access, then discuss historical and political attitudes toward reproductive technologies.
Embryo selection
-
1:11:18–1:15:22 (external site)
Hsu argues that better cognitive measurements could improve predictors and offers his interpretation of obstacles to collecting those data.
Polygenic scores
-
1:15:22–1:18:53 (external site)
Hsu calls proposed links between inherited disorders and cognitive traits speculative, then argues that future genetic interventions might avoid some trade-offs.
Evolutionary trade-offs
-
1:18:53–1:23:25 (external site)
Hsu distinguishes educational attainment from cognitive test performance and describes differences in predictive power within sibling pairs.
Polygenic scores
Research note: Sibling comparisons address specific sources of bias →
-
1:23:25–1:28:17 (external site)
The speakers discuss scientific communication and possible consumer uptake; Hsu distinguishes the IVF market from broader speculation about human evolution.
Genomic prediction business
-
1:28:17–1:33:02 (external site)
Hsu discusses adoption within IVF and praises independent scholarship, while considering the opportunities and constraints of cross-disciplinary work.
Scientific careers
-
1:33:02–1:36:43 (external site)
Hsu discusses scientific specialisation, then considers how predictor quality and the number of available embryos might affect selection.
Embryo selection
-
1:36:43–1:41:41 (external site)
Hsu discusses pluripotent-cell gametes, editing and iterated selection as possible future technologies, while acknowledging adoption concerns.
Genetic engineering
Research note: Producing functional mouse eggs is not human clinical validation →
-
1:41:41–1:44:48 (external site)
The speakers discuss possible inequality from reproductive technologies; Hsu acknowledges the concern and proposes broader public access.
Embryo selection
-
1:44:48–1:49:48 (external site)
Hsu and Patel discuss different approaches to programming and technical problems, including visual, spatial and verbal reasoning.
Cognitive abilities
-
1:49:48–1:53:05 (external site)
Hsu discusses visual reasoning and explains why derivatives pricing and data analysis have attracted people trained in physics.
Scientific careers
Research note: Mathematical similarity does not make a market a physical law →
-
1:53:05–1:58:02 (external site)
Hsu discusses experience with noisy experimental data; Patel compares it with debugging, before they turn to physicists’ career paths.
Scientific careers
-
1:58:02–2:03:02 (external site)
The speakers discuss transitions out of physics and use stories about Jeff Bezos to consider different combinations of abilities.
Scientific careers
-
2:03:02–2:07:18 (external site)
Hsu argues that cognitive abilities are multidimensional and discusses technical problem-solving and founders’ communication skills.
Cognitive abilities
Keep following
The feed includes new research notes and discussions. See this week’s additions →