Genetics
Evolution designed us to die fast; we can change that — Jacob Kimmel
25 discussions1 episode7 research notes
What does the evidence say?
Start with these 7 research notes.
- Context added
Selection experiments illuminate trade-offs, not a human expiry date
In the listening map: 0:00–5:00 →
- Context added
Antiviral protection has a specific target
In the listening map: 14:18–18:00 →
- Context added
Changing cell identity is not the same as preserving function
In the listening map: 30:52–35:13 →
- Context added
Successful delivery still has a target and a measured endpoint
In the listening map: 50:07–53:04 →
- Context added
Eroom’s Law is a historical productivity measure
In the listening map: 1:09:35–1:14:35 →
- Context added
A richer assay is an input to discovery
In the listening map: 1:24:15–1:28:02 →
- Context added
Healthcare spending and drug spending have different boundaries
In the listening map: 1:36:01–1:40:21 →
The listening map
Matched automatically from captions; may miss or mislabel.
25 discussions across 1 episodes.
Evolution designed us to die fast; we can change that — Jacob Kimmel
25 discussions · Timestamps from the Publisher audio edition
-
0:00–5:00 (external site)
Kimmel considers selective pressures and constraints that might explain limited longevity, using optimisation as an analogy.
Evolution and ageing
Research note: Selection experiments illuminate trade-offs, not a human expiry date →
-
5:00–9:20 (external site)
Patel and Kimmel discuss speculative explanations of intellectual achievement and Kimmel introduces a qualified kin-selection argument about longevity.
Evolution and ageing
-
9:20–14:18 (external site)
Kimmel discusses mutation constraints and host–pathogen competition, then considers why humans do not make antibiotics like microorganisms.
Evolution and ageing
-
18:00–22:28 (external site)
Kimmel explains how gene duplication can permit new functions while preserving an existing copy.
Gene duplication
-
22:28–27:13 (external site)
Kimmel rejects a single simple cause of ageing and describes NewLimit’s aim of changing gene regulation through transcription factors.
Cell programming
-
27:13–30:52 (external site)
Kimmel distinguishes youthful expression profiles from useful cell function and stresses retaining identity and checking potential harms.
Cell programming
-
30:52–35:13 (external site)
Kimmel explains why detecting and amplifying rare pluripotent cells made Yamanaka’s problem different from therapeutic rejuvenation.
Cell programming
Research note: Changing cell identity is not the same as preserving function →
-
35:13–38:11 (external site)
Kimmel describes single-cell measurements and computational prediction as ways to search a large space of transcription-factor combinations.
Genome interpretation
-
38:11–41:42 (external site)
Kimmel argues that developmental transcription factors provide useful experimental controls, while presenting evolutionary optimisation as an analogy.
Cell programming
-
41:42–45:23 (external site)
Patel and Kimmel compare gene regulation and neuroscience with machine-learning mechanisms before asking how pathogens and medicines affect transcription factors.
AI and biology
-
45:23–50:07 (external site)
Kimmel discusses viral interactions with gene regulation and explains physical challenges in targeting transcription factors with different drug types.
Gene delivery
-
50:07–53:04 (external site)
Kimmel describes lipid nanoparticles and viral vectors, including targeting limits and the distinction between delivery and downstream expression control.
Gene delivery
Research note: Successful delivery still has a target and a measured endpoint →
-
53:04–57:57 (external site)
Kimmel proposes engineered immune cells as future delivery systems, discusses CAR-T comparisons and acknowledges compartments they cannot readily reach.
Gene delivery
-
58:20–1:03:04 (external site)
Kimmel argues that improving one tissue might benefit others, but states that ageing reprogramming medicines do not yet exist.
Ageing
-
1:03:04–1:06:22 (external site)
Kimmel discusses payload size and hopes for durable effects while explicitly limiting the available reprogramming evidence to weeks.
Cell programming
-
1:06:22–1:09:35 (external site)
Kimmel considers engineered transcription factors and suggests that repairing extracellular structures may require additional cell states.
Cell programming
-
1:09:35–1:14:35 (external site)
Kimmel explains Eroom’s Law and discusses why drug-development economics differ from his expectations for AI investment.
Drug development
Research note: Eroom’s Law is a historical productivity measure →
-
1:14:59–1:19:21 (external site)
Kimmel distinguishes identifying useful targets from making molecules, then describes predictive cell models as a proposed route to better discovery.
Drug development
-
1:19:21–1:24:15 (external site)
Kimmel separates predicting expression changes from choosing desirable cell states and clarifies that his team is not currently using reinforcement learning.
Genome interpretation
-
1:24:15–1:28:02 (external site)
Kimmel explains Perturb-seq, describes technical improvements and says combinatorial experiments require reliable identification of multiple interventions.
Genome interpretation
-
1:28:02–1:31:32 (external site)
Kimmel describes NewLimit’s narrower modelling problem, selected cell types and proprietary data strategy as steps toward a broader ambition.
Drug development
-
1:31:32–1:36:01 (external site)
Kimmel offers hypotheses about reimbursement and direct purchasing for durable treatments while setting aside broader intellectual-property enforcement questions.
Healthcare economics
-
1:36:01–1:40:21 (external site)
Patel and Kimmel discuss spending categories and speculate that effective preventive medicines could reduce intensive healthcare use.
Healthcare economics
Research note: Healthcare spending and drug spending have different boundaries →
-
1:40:21–1:44:40 (external site)
Kimmel qualifies his dataset claim and discusses pharmaceutical partnerships; Patel closes by disclosing a small investment in NewLimit.
Drug development
Keep following
The feed includes new research notes and discussions. See this week’s additions →