Archaeology

Aldrete and Fridman introduce ancient history through Hannibal, mortality and the question of how much human behaviour has changed.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete describes the agricultural basis of ancient societies and explains why Roman history remains influential.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete discusses Roman ancestor masks and the pressure of family reputation, then considers modern memories of conflict.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete examines social mobility and outlines Rome’s monarchy, republic and empire before discussing Greek influence.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete describes Greek and Etruscan influences and argues that incorporating other peoples helped Rome expand.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete links Rome’s resilience in war to incorporation and discusses citizenship, provincial participation and military service.

Archaeological evidence

Research note: Citizenship could be documented in bronze →

Aldrete continues discussing service and citizenship, then introduces the conflict between Rome and Carthage.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete recounts Hannibal’s victories, Roman responses and Scipio’s campaign leading to Zama.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete examines Hannibal’s use of terrain and the encirclement at Cannae, then introduces infantry formations.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete contrasts the phalanx with Roman tactical flexibility and begins discussing the development of armour.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete describes the evidence behind his linen-armour project and how the team reconstructed and tested protection.

Archaeological evidence

Research note: A successful reconstruction tests a possibility →

Aldrete discusses variations in linen, uncertainty about adhesives and what reconstruction can reveal about ancient technology.

Archaeological evidence

The conversation moves from later uses of linen protection to Alexander, his inherited army and cultural incorporation.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete considers the durability of Alexander’s empire, then introduces Roman law and examples preserved in legal texts.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete discusses legal problems involving a barber, livestock and flooding, and describes the public character of Roman courts.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete discusses citizen privileges, categories of enslaved labour and the sources through which people entered slavery.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete discusses manumission and slave collars before turning to human behaviour and tensions within the republic.

Archaeological evidence

Research note: A collar carries more evidence than its inscription →

Aldrete connects inequality and political grievances to opportunities for powerful leaders, including Caesar.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete discusses Marius, Sulla, Pompey and Caesar, then the contest for power after Caesar’s assassination.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete describes Octavian’s struggle with Antony and his later use of offices, titles and public presentation.

Archaeological evidence

The conversation moves from Augustus’s long rule to Cleopatra’s dynasty and relationships with Caesar and Antony.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete discusses Cleopatra’s death, biases in accounts of powerful women and examples including Eumachia and Musa.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete discusses the recovery of Roman standards from Parthia and the governing example Augustus left to successors.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete examines the gap between republican forms and concentrated power, including Augustus’s account of his own achievements.

Archaeological evidence

Research note: Augustus advertised restraint while recording his powers →

Aldrete considers changing attitudes toward Caesar’s conquest, later political imagery and Cicero’s oratory.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete discusses emotional appeals, courtroom props and the role of gesture in Roman public speaking.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete and Fridman discuss physical delivery and emotional persuasion, drawing comparisons with modern speakers.

Archaeological evidence

The conversation considers rhetorical misuse and ineffective gestures before turning to Roman polytheism.

Archaeological evidence

Aldrete discusses Roman religion and Christian persecution through the example of Pliny’s correspondence.

Archaeological evidence

Research note: Administrative uncertainty coexisted with persecution →

Aldrete discusses possible attractions of Christianity, the roles of women and enslaved people, and religious legitimacy.

Archaeological evidence