What does the evidence say?
- Context added
Ancestry change does not explain how newcomers prevailed
- Context added
Surviving DNA is not a head count of ancestors
- Context added
Missing ancient samples leave room for competing models
- Context added
Ancestry components describe models, not pure peoples
- Context added
The familiar definition was intended for a system, not an isolated individual
- Context added
Schrödinger proposed an informational structure without solving heredity
- Context added
An inorganic network demonstrates feedback without establishing life
- Context added
The proposed threshold concerns molecular evidence, not a universal life switch
- Context added
The debate concerns explanatory claims as well as terminology
- Context added
Dyson’s longevity scenario depends on cosmological and biological assumptions
- Context added
Earthly signaling data can inspire a search without validating an alien model
- Context added
A universal automaton proves computational capability within a formal model